(朝鮮日報 韓国語 2017/04/19)

ドナルド・トランプ大統領が去る6~7日の米・中首脳会談当時、シー・チンピン(習近平)主席と交わした韓国と中国の歴史的関係に対する発言の内容が一歩遅れて知られて議論になっている。シー主席が長時間説明した韓・中両国関係の内容には「韓国が歴史的に中国の一部」という一方的な中華主義に立った認識も含まれた模様である

アメリカのオンラインメディア『クォーツ(Quartz)』は19日(現地時間)「トランプがシー主席と会談後、ウォール・ストリート・ジャーナル(WSJ)に話した発言は完全に誤っており、韓国社会を完全に激怒させかねない」と評価した

トランプがWSJに話した発言というのは、去る12日(現地時刻)、 WSJに載せられたトランプ大統領のインタビュー有料記事の内容だ。トランプ大統領はこのインタビューで「シー主席から韓国と中国の歴史についての授業を受けた」とし「韓国は(歴史的に)事実上、中国の一部であった(Korea actually used to be a part of China)」と述べた。トランプ大統領は、ここでの韓国は北朝鮮でなく韓半島(朝鮮半島)全体を意味することとも説明した

トランプ大統領はまた「数千年間、北朝鮮と韓国を相手にしてきた中国によれば、北朝鮮を扱うことは非常に容易ではないものと思われる。私は中国が北朝鮮を扱うことができるだろうと信じてきましたが、私たちの考えとは状況が異なることもある」と付け加えた。

クォーツ(Quartz)はこれに対し「トランプはアジア地域の歴史に対する自身の知識や見解がなく、シー主席から聞いたのがすべてだろうと推定される」とし「シー主席の歴史観はどこからきただろうか。中国国家主義からではないだろうか」とトランプ大統領がインタビューで述べた発言を評価した。(機械翻訳 若干修正)


韓国がどちらによりファビョるのか楽しみですね。

それにしても、ここまで長く↓反論する『クォーツ(Quartz)』とは・・・


 WSJ Trump Interview Excerpts: China, North Korea, Ex-Im Bank, Obamacare, Bannon, More
(The Wall Street Journal Apr 12, 2017)

(略)He then went into the history of China and Korea. Not North Korea, Korea. And you know, you’re talking about thousands of years …and many wars. And Korea actually used to be a part of China. And after listening for 10 minutes I realized that not — it’s not so easy. You know I felt pretty strongly that they have — that they had a tremendous power over China. I actually do think they do have an economic power, and they have certainly a border power to an extent, but they also — a lot of goods come in. But it’s not what you would think. It’s not what you would think.(略)
(Quartz April 18, 2017 WRITTEN BY Nikhil Sonnad)

Following his meeting with Chinese president Xi Jinping, Donald Trump made a shocking admission of ignorance to the Wall Street Journal, on the subject of China and North Korea: “After listening [to Xi] for 10 minutes I realized that…it’s not so easy.” Trump has been called out for having his views on such an important geopolitical issue shift dramatically in a matter of minutes. He also may not know who rules North Korea.

Right before that line about listening to Xi, though, Trump said something arguably even more shocking. He claimed that “Korea actually used to be a part of China.” This is a glaring historical inaccuracy that has, somehow, not yet enraged South Korea, which is usually extremely defensive about suggestions that it is lesser than China or has ever been dependent on it.

Trump also made it clear in the interview that when he says Korea “used to be a part of China,” he is talking about the entire Korean peninsula, not just the North. Here’s the full quote:

【[Xi] then went into the history of China and Korea. Not North Korea, Korea. And you know, you’re talking about thousands of years …and many wars. And Korea actually used to be a part of China.

“No respectable historian would make such a claim,” said Kyung Moon Hwang, a history professor at the University of Southern California and author of A History of Korea, when I asked him via email to assess Trump’s statement.

We can probably assume that Trump did not have ideas of his own about this matter of Asian history, and in fact got this notion from Xi. But where would Xi have gotten it? “It’s possible that Xi said something like this, as such a story has been part of the nationalist history project under the Chinese Communist Party for a couple of decades,” added Hwang.

There are two moments in history that come close. The first was under the Han Dynasty, which in the second century BC set up four “commanderies” in the northern part of Korea. These, however, were more like British colonial rule in India, and not a formal union of Chinese and Korean territory. Still, Chinese researchers have tried to argue that this places Korea within “Chinese local history.”

The next moment came in 13th century AD, when the Mongol empire’s global domination happened to include both China and Korea. After a total of seven campaigns to take Korea, the Mongols succeeded, but “even then, the Mongols controlled China more directly than Korea,” said Hwang. Setting aside the controversial question of whether the empire of Mongol invaders counts as “China,” Korea was regardless only a vassal state of the Mongols.

If Xi said “something like this,” though, it is unlikely that he said anything as strong as Korea being “part of China.” He could have reasonably said something to the effect of, “Korea was once a part of the same empire as China.” That would apply to the Yuan Dynasty, the one set up by the Mongols and ruled by Kublai Khan. Or he may have said, “China once ruled Korea,” which could maybe work for the Han Dynasty. Trump could have then interpreted either of those statements as meaning Korea was “part” of China—which would be wrong, of course. Or maybe there was a translation issue. We’ll probably never know what Xi actually said.

Still, to Hwang’s point, the perception of Korea being part of China has some credibility in the mainland. For example, one question on Zhidao—a question-and-answer site akin to Quora—asks (link in Chinese), “Do Koreans know that Korea was once part of China?”

To which the top answerer responds, correctly, “you are mistaken.”